On 8/16/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How would this work for actions that are with N supporters and without > > M objections? > > We haven't got any of those at the moment. If we added one, then these > could be reworded as "the tally of votes MUST include <x>", with the > R208 amendment allowing the irrelevant bits to be omitted.
Any particular reason not to do that now, so we don't have to worry about it later? -root
