Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:e.g. why bother enshrining the basic behavior of some concept in a Power 3 rule if you're going to let Power 2 rules modify that behavior?Perhaps some aspects need to be power=3 difficult to modify, but other aspects should be modifiable at power=2 in certain well-defined ways. Makes perfect sense to me.
Ah, point. Well, that can be added if/when we come up with such a case in practice.
