root wrote:
On 8/29/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
comex wrote:
I submit the following proposal:
Proposal: Refactor regulation
(AI = 3, please)
Murphy is a coauthor of this proposal.
Why? And why did those who voted AGAINST it do so? Perhaps this one
could do with some more cooking time.
Primarily because I don't think that impossible actions should
necessarily be considered regulated.
Which of the sections do you think this applies to? For each of those
sections, can you give a hypothetical example of an impossible action
that should not be considered regulated?
