Proto-Proposal: Formalize judicial findings
(AI = 3, please)
Amend Rule 591 (Inquiry Cases) by appending this text:
A judicial finding is a judgement of a question on veracity
that is not appealed within the time limit for doing so, or
that is sustained on appeal.
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing this text:
Some types of sentence include a duration known as the tariff.
When a sentence with a tariff is in effect, the sentence is
thereafter either active or not. The sentence is inactive for
the first week after it first takes effect. Thereafter, the
sentence is active if and only if it is still in effect and
sentences of the same type on the same question on sentencing
have been active for a total duration less than the tariff. The
CotC's report includes the status of all active sentences.
with this text:
Some types of sentence include a duration known as the tariff.
When a sentence with a tariff is in effect, the sentence is
in progress while all of the following are true:
a) The sentence first took effect at least one week earlier,
and is still in effect.
b) Sentences of the same type on the same question on sentencing
have been in progress for a total duration less than the
tariff.
The CotC's report includes the status of all sentences in
progress.
and by replacing each other instance of "active" with "in progress".
Amend Rule 2126 (Voting Credits) by replacing "a sentence becomes
active" with "a sentence becomes in progress".
[Rule 2110 (Win by Paradox) should be revised to use this definition,
hence the request for AI = 3.]
