pikhq wrote:
The recordkeeporship of VCs being split amongst these different offices just makes VCs far too tricky to handle. Just leave it all with the Accountor. Also, why does the Accountor keep track of all VDs, but not all VCs?
VC tracking is the bulk of the Assessor's workload - I have to update a set of perpetual figures every time a batch of proposals is resolved, and every time a judgement is delivered - hence the attempt to split it up more finely. Resolving proposals is simpler, since the figures are non-perpetual; the complex part (determining which rule changes are successful) is handled by the Rulekeepor. VDs would come into play less frequently. I originally had them colored as well, but was later convinced to drop that; as a consequence, they can also be handed to the Accountor, who otherwise would only have to track a few rare types of VC. Separate VC reports for every color would be a bit more work for the players to look up their current holdings, but given that one or two players still routinely vote beyond their EVLOP without noting that they're doing so, I have little sympathy on the topic.
