On Sunday 25 November 2007 20:20:24 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote:
>
> > Without two objections, I intend to form a contract for the purposes of a
> > contest.
>
> I object to all your intents to form a contest within the past 24
> hours.
>
> The AFO objects to all your intents to form a contest within the
> past 24 hours.
>
The AFO retracts those intents.
The AFO OBJECTS to those intents.
(this doesn't matter)
Finally, I OBJECT to those intents.
I do not win the game.
I submit the following proposal, named "Fair dependent contracts":
Amend Rule 1742 so that this paragraph:
A contract CAN optionally be formed without two objections. A
contract formed in this way is a dependent contract. Any
player CAN dissolve a dependent contract without three
objections.
reads as follows:
A contract CAN optionally be formed without two objections. A
contract formed in this way is a dependent contract, unless it is a
private contract. Any player CAN dissolve a dependent contract without
three objections.
[Try to prevent private contract from being formed dependently.]
