root wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 9:08 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rule 2110 (either version) is not expressed as setting up a delayed
action.
Indeed. To me it reads as if it the rule acts at the moment the
judgement is entered, provided that it remains unappealed for the
following week. Since that status cannot be known for a week, it
seems better to me to interpret it as a delayed action than as
temporarily splitting the gamestate.
I interpret it as the rule acting one week after the judgement is
entered.
