On Jan 7, 2008 5:15 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My apologies. Not a criminal case, so I can't appeal it directly. I support > this intent to appeal.
If I understand Iammars' somewhat laconic arguments correctly, e is pointing out that R2159 defines the only mechanism for initiating a protective decree, and so a protective decree categorically cannot be submitted to Steve Wallace whether e is a nomic or not. Submitting one would thus violate R2159 in the sense that R2159 declares it impossible. If you really want a ruling on the matter that you intended, whether it is legal to *claim* something to be a protective decree to Steve Wallace, then I suggest you create a new case with a better-worded statement. -root
