> > R2144 only applies to partnerships with identical bases. I'm also > > concerned about overlapping non-identical bases. > > Aha, so e.g. 3 players could create and register 4 partnerships > (AB, AC, BC, ABC), and it gets worse as the number of conspirators > increases. Would it suffice to prevent a partnership from standing > up if any member of its basis is also a member of the basis of a > standing player?
I think that something like this issue has been true for voting on proposals for some time now. Frankly, I'm a little surprised it hasn't been scammed yet. (Or has it? If it had, I would have assumed it would have been patched in legislation...) watcher -- e^(pi*i) + 1 = 0
