On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 5:09 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That deals with the case where "by announcement" is included. As I said, >> R2019 doesn't even include that. > > Ah, I hadn't noticed that. I would maintain then that the Speaker is > never able to assign prerogatives.
Fun! That's been true from the beginning of the Rule. I don't think a veto or a rubberstamp has been used (and they will have self-ratified), and default justice assignments are still good. That just leaves Default Officeholder: I think someone did take some actions by claiming an office recently (or did they just publish a report?) ... -Goethe
