On 18:06 Thu 07 Feb , comex wrote: > I initiate an inquiry case on the statement: > * There is a Rule 9999. > > Arguments: > The criminal case deals only with whether I believed a Rule 9999 to > exist, not whether it actually /did/. Therefore, I think an > additional CFJ is necessary.
Agreed. My criminal CFJ was mostly for the purposes of punishment, not resolving the scam.
