On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The "question yes/no = equivalent statement true/false" is a legal fiction > > that applies only after the CFJ is initiated. Until that CFJ is clearly > > initiated, the answer to the question (yes/no) is clearly different than > > the action effect of a directive statement "I hereby DO". *sigh* you're > > going to make me answer this, aren't you? > > I was happy to let your koan stand, but since you've already written > up a fairly convincing (to me, anyway) more, uh, Agora-typical > reasoning, I consent to have the penal judge REMAND as well.
I also consent to this judgement. -woggle
