On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems a bit cumbersome, especially the whole "tortoise" terminology.
Well, at least it's not broken like the current rule is. -root
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5451-5457 Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5... Geoffrey Spear
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposa... Ian Kelly
- DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5451-... Ed Murphy
