root wrote: > Or here's another option. If a judge gets a case file with a lack of > arguments, e could, you know, ping the caller for arguments. Judging > UNDETERMINED without even making an effort is arrogant and uncalled > for.
Which is why I proposed requiring it (likewise for SLIPPERY). And in cases like this, the judge doesn't even need to ping the caller, e just needs to go to the archive and look up the message in which the case was initiated.
