On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > comex hasn't agreed to anything in panel 1903a, so it can't be > judged and a > > > > concurring opinion hasn't been published. I judge FALSE on both 1908 > & 1909. > > > > > > I intend to appeal CFJ 1908. > > > > Uh, did you mean to appeal or also appeal CFJ 1909? If you really want > > to argue CFJ 1908, then can you please explain exactly what concurring > > opinion you think the panel published? If it's comex's, then, well, it > > seems that that wasn't ever sent to the public forum (the part of it > > quoting verbatim Goethe's arguments was, but not AFAICT the part of it > > that was comex's actual commentary). > > I don't believe a panel's deliberations need to be made in the public > forum. [snip]
I agree, but publishing something, like a concurring opinion, does. -woggle
