root wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> comex wrote: >> >> > On 3/17/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Is it reasonable to interpret assets as being transferred from a >> >> state of being unowned to a state of being owned by <entity>? >> > >> > Yes, but it is unreasonable to interpret objects as being transferred >> > from the ownership of <null> to the ownership of <entity>. >> >> This is a silly viewpoint. Assets are not a database; there is no such >> thing as "ownership of <null>". > > Exactly. So how can something be transferred from it?
It can't, but go back and read what I wrote earlier; there is another interpretation of transference that you haven't addressed.
