On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree to this: > > 1) This public contract is named Universe 1. > 2) Beans are a class of assets. > 3) The recordkeepor of beans is Murphy. > 4) Beans are restricted to the class of players whose nickname > is Murphy or pikhq. > > and this: > > A) This public contract is named Universe A. > B) Beans are a class of assets. > C) The recordkeepor of beans is Murphy. > D) Beans are restricted to the class of players whose nickname > is Murphy or comex. > > The AFO agrees to both of these. > > I create 2 beads in my possession. > I transfer 1 bead to pikhq. > > I call for judgement on the following statements: > > * Murphy has a bead. > * pikhq has a bead.
Trivially FALSE. Beads certainly aren't beans. Regardless, I think you want to think you should always go for broke on these things/discourage judgements of UNDECIDABLE, and so call for judgement on "It is possible for Murphy to destroy a bean by announcement" or similar. -woggle
