Pavitra wrote: > On Monday 07 April 2008 8:02 Ed Murphy wrote: >> root wrote: >>> There must be some way of making this cleaner. >> By generalizing "weekly duties" beyond officers? > > Actually, the third paragraph of R2166 implies that this is already done.
Non-officer reports are not directly defined. > At any rate, it's much more likely I'll go with the asset version, so > contemplation of this proposal's various brain damages is probably of limited > utility. Unless I'm missing something, that version could still benefit from a direct definition of the reports/duties of non-officer recordkeepors.
