On 5/25/08, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 9:04 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't know if I'd classify the PRS as a scam....I don't have any > > hidden agenda apart from providing a backing for existing contests and > > permitting one person to administer multiple "contests" (or allowing > > non-players to do so). My only reason for de-contestifying the AAA is > > because the rules do not permit me to be contestmaster of the PRS and > > the AAA simultaneously. > > > If it's desirable to allow one person to administer several contests, > propose a rule change that would allow it rather than creating a new > outside-the-rules framework for contests. I support outside-the-rules frameworks, but putting everything in the same contest would decrease the number of awardable points.
- Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contestmasters? Geoffrey Spear
- Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contestmasters? Buddha Buck
- Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contestmasters? Geoffrey Spear
- Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contestmasters? Ed Murphy
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contestmasters? Elliott Hird
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contestmast... Geoffrey Spear
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contestmast... Roger Hicks
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be contest... Geoffrey Spear
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be con... Roger Hicks
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-players be... Geoffrey Spear
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-playe... comex
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-p... comex
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-p... Roger Hicks
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-p... Geoffrey Spear
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-p... Roger Hicks
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-p... Roger Hicks
- Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why can't non-p... Ian Kelly
- Re: BAK: Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why ca... Roger Hicks
- Re: BAK: Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Why ca... Roger Hicks