Wooble wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - it is about a situation that occured before the case was >> filed (i.e. not arising from the case itself, and not occuring >> after the initiation of that case) > I don't like this clause; it seems to me that the inability to decide > with certainty the legality of an actual past game action is exactly > what wins by paradox are supposed to be for, at least in Suber's > formulation. Whoops, I wrote the exact opposite of what I meant to say. Thanks for noticing!
> Also, completely unrelated to the substance of the proposal, I'm > fairly certain you misspelled "occurred" and "occurring", unless this > is a case of Brits not doubling (doublling?) a consonant when > Americans do, instead of the usual other way around. Yes, it's a misspelling. -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>
