Kerim Aydin wrote: >I support this. In addition to Quazie's comment above, the very definition >of Patent Title (r649) is "a legal item given in recognition of a *person's* >distinction" so I question the judge's assertion that Patent Titles are not >limited to persons.
We had a judicial decision at one point that only persons could bear patent titles. We then amended R649 specifically to change that. A patent title is *given* in recognition of a person's distinction, but *bearing* it is not tied to personhood. -zefram
