On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I am notehird now, it's not that ambiguous. (This escapes me > from that evil pledge, for what it's worth)
I'm not entirely convinced. You're the same person who was referred to by the pledge, regardless of a change in nickname. I'd argue that what's important is to whom the contract refers, not the name under which it does so. "ehird" probably remains an R754(1) synonym for "notehird".
