On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Good catch. As ehird isn't registered, E isn't a player, so E can't >> be in the manroster regardless of what the manroster says (unless the >> contract somehow has a greater power than the rule indicating what a >> player is, in that case the manroster may have defined ehird as a >> player...) > > In that case, ehrid still has two partners, so the attempts to > deregister it were unsuccessful. Updating records accordingly.
No, the attempts to deregister it were based upon the belief that the Manroster only contained ehird (and e was therefore the only partner). It now turns out that the Manroster actually only contained Ivan Hope CXXVII. So this has no bearing on the success or failure of the deregistration attempts. -root
