On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:47 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree to the following: "This is a pledge. Guvf vf n cyrqtr. Vina > Ubcr PKKIVV FUNYY fngvfsl gur Jvaavat Pbaqvgvba bs Zhfvpvnafuvc nf > fbba nf cbffvoyr." > > I initiate a CFJ on the statement 'The contract Ivan Hope just agreed > to is a pledge because it states "Guvf vf n cyrqtr.", which is "This > is a pledge." in rot13.' > > A week or so from now, I plan to initiate a criminal CFJ against > myself for failing to satisfy the above contract by not winning by > Musicianship within seven days. My arguments will be that as the > contract does not say "as soon as possible" but "nf fbba nf cbffvoyr", > the definition in rule 1023 does not apply, and I instead must win on > June 30, 2009. > > By the way, in case you haven't figured it out yet, the pledge is in > rot13, for which a decoder exists at http://www.rot13.com/index.php. > > --Ivan Hope CXXVII >
I think that the CFJ should be judged FALSE. The pledge is a pledge because it says it's a pledge in non-rot13.
