On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Sgeo wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I go on hold. I come off hold. I repeat the last two actions 999 more times. >> >> I'm just going to infer from CFJ 1774 that the last 999 of these failed. >> >> -root >> > Are there any significant problems with the idea that I could have > repeated that line 999 more times in one message?
There also might be an implied standard on the recordkeepor's end. If the resulting recordkeepor's effort is merely to note in the records "Sgeo went on and off hold 999 times" (and not, say, post 1000 separate CFJs), the recordkeepor might consider shrugging and making the note, and a judge might not find it unreasonable that a recordkeepor should do that. This is said not knowing if Sgeo's actions have some deeper and harder-to-track impact. -Goethe
