On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Sgeo wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I thought that ENDORSE Agora was already defined.. I remember seeing >>>> it somewhere.. maybe it was in a proto and I got confused and thought >>>> that it was in a rule.. >>> >>> Umm, you saw it in the proposal you're voting on conditionally. >>> >> >> I could have sworn I saw it somewhere else.. >> > > I'm a bit tired right now. Agora's not a good game to play while tired.
Don't worry, voting on a conditional that can't be resolved without the result of the vote is very Agoran. -G.
