On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote: > On Monday 14 July 2008 11:02:04 am Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ben Caplan wrote: >>> On Sunday 13 July 2008 11:43:28 pm Ed Murphy wrote: >>>> A public claim intended to mislead others (whether directly >>>> or indirectly) regarding one's identity constitutes a false >>>> statement, and SHOULD be severely punished. >>> >>> A person SHALL NOT make a public claim intended to mislead others, >>> either directly or indirectly, regarding eir identity. >>> >>> [Less clunky, and allows infractions to be punished against a >>> power-3 rule rather than a power-1 one.] >> >> Do you mean that any Rule containing a SHALL NOT can be punished at >> power-3 because it violates MMI? Has that interpretation been >> tested? > > No, R2170 (into which the paragraph in question is protoproposed to be > inserted) is power-3.
Oh I see, Murphy's version deferred the infraction to the rule defining false statements. Got it. -Goethe
