On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:15 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal: a probably unsuccessful attempt at deregistering ehird
> because I forgot to vote AGAINST 5582
>
> Upon the adoption of this proposal, ehird deregisters emself by announcement.

Please make it "ehird is deregistered" and wait for him to commit a
crime so we can EXILE him.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this would be effective, this would create a whole new ugly
> precedent of "This proposal says you say you do, therefore you say you
> do and do".

I believe the power threshold for causing a message to be sent is 2.
My reasoning: it's established that a contract can allow other people
to act on behalf of its parties. As I understand it, this is implied
by the fact that if there were no such mechanisms, partnerships would
have no way to act. The rule defining partnerships is a power-2 rule.
Apart from the definition in Rule 478, "Fora", power 3, there is no
other way to send a message.

--Ivan Hope CXXVII

Reply via email to