On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I retract my previous similarly-titled proposal. > > Proposal: Prerogative implies choice > (AI = 2, please) > > Amend Rule 2019 (Prerogatives) by replacing section b) with this text: > > b) Justiciar. Once within three days after an appeal case comes > to require a judge, the Justiciar CAN make that case either > hot or cold by announcement. If the Justiciar has not done > so, then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL NOT assign a panel to > that case during this period. If the Justiciar has done so, > then the Clerk of the Courts SHALL assign a panel including > (if the case is hot) or excluding (if it is cold) the > Justiciar, if possible. > > Upon the adoption of this proposal, the Prerogative of Justiciar is > assigned to the person (if any) to whom the Prerogative of Default > Justice was assigned immediately before the adoption of this proposal.
I'll be voting against this; the delay it imposes is unacceptable. -root
