On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For one thing, Quazie's EVLOD is 5, right? Assuming we treat this as > pseudo-C, the result differs depending on whether "myevlod" is an int > (5/2 = 2; FOR AGAINST FOR AGAINST PRESENT) or a float (5.0/2 = 2.5; > FOR AGAINST FOR AGAINST FOR plus invalid votes of AGAINST and > PRESENT). Although Rule 2156 only allows EVLODs to be integers, if a > higher power Rule sets an EVLOD to something that is not an integer, > Rule 2156 will allow it to remain such (and it will be required to be > reported on) for the remainder of the week.
Good point. I'll consider the first four votes to be clearly identified, and the remaining vote(s) to be unclear. Which is for all practical purposes equivalent to Quazie's stated intent anyway, since the additional PRESENT vote is irrelevant to the outcome. -root
