On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're too concerned with the facts of this case.
Patent nonsense. BobTHJ, your arguments lead me to believe that you have no basis other than personal (or contractual) bias on this issue. H. Murphy, would you be willing to approve the decision of a majority of the panel? -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown
