On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:11 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2048a: I support woggle's intent to send the message below. The
> required support having been achieved, I send this message on behalf
> of the panel:
>
> {
> As Taral has not cited the precedent on which apparently eir judgment is
> based, eir judgment is in serious doubt. Therefore, this panel judges
> REASSIGN.
> }
If you wanted clarification, you could have just remanded it to me. I
think I'm actually kind of insulted by this.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
