Taral wrote: >Proto-Proposal: Clarify REMAND vs REASSIGN That's not a clarification, it's a shift in the balance between these two options. I like the balance where it is, and don't have your objection to gratuitous REASSIGNments.
>{Note that these say judgement, not arguments. As worded, neither of
>these judgements are appropriate if the panel feels that the judgement
>is appropriate but the arguments insufficient.}
Yes, this is also an intentional feature of the rule.
-zefram
