On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 16:26, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I change all sitting players to standing. > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2107 > > ========================= Criminal Case 2107 ========================= > > Ivan Hope violated R2149 by making the untruthful statement > "UNDECIDABLE is never appropriate." > > ========================================================================
Based on the result of the appeal, I don't think there's any good reason to assign a judgment other than GUILTY on culpability. Now, as for sentencing, the appeals result suggested that FINE was not harsh enough. A sentence of APOLOGY seems a little silly this far from the event. A sentence like EXILE - 1 second wouldn't be helpful because ihope already took the asset-loss penalties. And Ivan Hope's voting limit is currently 1 and likely to remain so for a while, making CHOKEY not very interesting. And I'm not convinced that the rule breach is harsh enough to mandate EXILE with a substantial tariff. Comments? - woggle
