On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:04, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 12:01 -0700, Charles Reiss wrote: >> I also support the appeal of CFJ 2086-7. As root has stated, >> long-standing game custom allows the actions of a message to have some >> ordering in legal time even though they take effect at the same >> instant of physical time. (I do not believe that tusho's arguments >> have merit: although a light that is turning on may be neither off or >> on, it is one of on or not on.) > Rule 478 is very clear that multiple actions by announcement in the same > message happen simultaneously.
They say that they happen at the time date-stamped on the message. This is not the same thing as simultaneously, since in the magical universe of the rules we can order actions that occur at the same instant. -woggle
