On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Fails, the decision in question didn't exist when woggle attempted to >>> democratise it, so eir action failed due to not clearly specifying what >>> it was talking about. >> >> How much clearer could it be than specifying the exact ID number of >> the proposal it intended to democritize? >> >> I call for judgement, barring ais523, on "Proposal 5707 is a >> democratic proposal." > > I agree with ais523, though it's not really a matter of clarity. Per > R1728, "A player authorized to perform a dependent action (the > initiator) CAN publicly announce eir intent to do so...", thus > announcing intent to perform a dependent action is itself a regulated > action. At the time woggle announced eir intent, e was not authorized > to perform the dependent action (which is also regulated), so e COULD > NOT effectively announce eir intent at that time.
Ooh, I didn't know that. I think there's at least a few times I announced intent before I could do something anticipating that I'd be able to do it a few days later. -Goethe
