On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well my argument is that as many people put a different interpretation on it, > you can't claim that you are /unambiguously/ correct; BobTHJ and I both went > with a different, entirely reasonable, interpretation of the abbreviation. > Either your interpretation is wrong, or it is ambiguous which interpretation > is correct; in both cases, the proposal passes.
False dilemma. It's also possible that your interpretation is wrong, in which case the proposal fails. -root
