On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The quoted notice is invalid because it lacks information required by > Rule 107. Specifically, the following information was not provided: > > (c) A clear indication of the options available.
CFJ 1800 (and indirectly 1650 and 1722) set the precedent that if this is not explicitly specified, then it's implicit in the nature of the matter to be decided (i.e. whether to adopt a proposal). -root
