On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 17:25 +0100, Zefram wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
> >X-Date-Stamp header saying the same thing. That one's definitely a date
> >stamp!
>
> Saying it doesn't make it so.
>
Well, I think it's pretty uncontroversially a date stamp, albeit one
with the wrong date on. The scam itself fails for all sorts of reasons
(for instance, there's a 1 in 2 chance that Agora (then yoyo) didn't
exist at the date stated, depending on the milliseconds fields), but I
wanted to spark some discussion.
--
ais523
