On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:48 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would you care to elaborate on that? I get TRUE when applying the logic > of CFJ 2203.
In CFJ 2203 I ruled that root cast 3 separate conditional votes. In this case, BobTHJ also cast 5 separate votes, one of which had its condition evaluate to FOR and the other 4 evaluated to PRESENT.
