comex wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I could record this in the database as three separate assigns (similar >> to appeal panels, a holdover from the old justices / appellate judges >> system) but I'm concerned that it might confuse some of the scripts. I >> recommend the following instead (the case can still be appealed): > > I have to say I disagree with preventing interesting rule changes due > to arbitrary technical limitations...can't you fix the scripts?
I could, but I also think requiring a panel for all such cases is overkill; not all of them will be controversial, and (again) those that are can be unilaterally appealed by any party.
