On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 14:18, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:12 AM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 21:58, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> (Also, psst: you're supposed to be voting LLAMA votes only, not SELL. >>> Post a sell ticket and vote LLAMA (endorse filler), I guess.) >> >> The way the contract was worded I only needed for vote LLAMA in place >> of FOR and AGAINST votes, of which I was casting none. >> >> BobTHJ > > "On an Agoran decision with an adoption index, Llamas SHALL NOT cast a > vote other than LLAMA (X) for some X." You casted votes of "endorse > filler", which are votes other than LLAMA (X) (unless, I suppose, the > filler specifies a LLAMA vote). > you omitted the last part of that clause which states "where X evaluates to FOR or AGAINST." Since I wasn't casting votes of FOR or AGAINST, I didn't need to cast them as Llama votes.
BobTHJ
