On 16 Oct 2008, at 07:01, Ian Kelly wrote:
There's not enough context here. The fact that RFC 2 was created via
RFC 1 demonstrates that the rules were at least somewhat amendable,
not that they are. Would the initiator please provide the text of RFC
1 and whatever rules were in effect at the time the case was
initiated?
-root
http://groups.google.com/group/nomic-217/web/last-official-report
Ordered by list of creation, an RFC with more dissents than concurs
is not part of the
game, iirc. Only the first few should be relevant, btw.
I argue for FALSE because Nomic 217 isn't really a game, but the game
it purports to
define precedence to is a nomic.
--
ehird
