On Thursday 23 October 2008 04:10:14 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
> * FLOYD, appropriate if the statement was logically capable
> of being described as either true or false with equal accuracy
Accuracy may be equally "not much" (.01==.01). Probably better to say
something like:
* FLOYD, appropriate if the statement logically could have been
consistently described as either true or false
which I think is what this is trying to get at, the concept of logical
tautology.
> * UNDETERMINED, appropriate if the statement is nonsensical
> or too vague, or if the information available to the judge is
> insufficient to determine which of the TRUE, FALSE, and UNDECIDABLE
> judgements is appropriate; however, uncertainty as to how to
> interpret or apply the rules cannot constitute insufficiency of
> information for this purpose
"which of the TRUE, FALSE, UNDECIDABLE, and FLOYD judgements"
Pavitra
