Pavitra wrote:

> On Friday 24 October 2008 11:14:43 am Ed Murphy wrote:
>>       The initiator is unqualified to be assigned as judge of the
>>       case.  All other members of the bases of the parties to the
>>       contract are also unqualified, except while this would result
>>       in all entities being unqualified.
> 
> I'm not necessarily recommending changing it, but can someone explain 
> the advantages and disadvantages of this version versus "all other 
> members of the bases of the parties to the contract are poorly 
> qualified"?

Rule 1868 says the CotC SHALL NOT assign a poorly-qualified judge.  In
this situation, EXCUSED is possible, but not guaranteed (is it worse
to assign a poorly-qualified judge, or to leave the case unassigned?).

Reply via email to