On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In this case, any announcement that "identifies the player", > regardless of whether it does so by name, necessarily unambiguously > specifies em; that the meaning of "identify". I statement of the form > "I award a Bean to Wooble" is equivalent to "I award a Bean to the > player who first assigned a judgment to CFJ 2238" if the statement is > made after this judgment is submitted; either one would successfully > award a Bean to me.
Not if there is a non-negligible chance that the CotC's report of who first assigned a judgement is wrong, as is the case for asset reports (CFJ 1307).
