On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 31 Oct 2008, at 18:10, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> Honestly, I thought I mentioned CFJ 1520 just last week. -Goethe > > I don't think there's much of a reasonable way to refer to that contract in > name-ular > form save for "ehird", and the PBA talks about "ehird".
Why don't you read that CFJ again? -G.
