ais523 wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > It has two + mills, I'm pretty sure; at least it did last I checked, > > did one get demolished by water rights or something? I'll see if I > > can dig out the last published AAA report to check. > It seems that you missed land #0 (a + mill) off a report sometime in > October; it had it at the start of October but not at the end of > October, with no obvious way to have lost it in the meantime (unless > it was destroyed by a late water rights enforcement at the start of > October, I didn't check for that). This has since self-ratified; but > if the + mill in question was destroyed accidentally by ratification, > we should probably equity to get it back. Ah, it was land #131 that went missing due to October's water rights.
I'll have to go tell the PNP it doesn't have as many lands as it thinks... (Or some kind PerlNomicite could give it a + mill, I suppose.) -- ais523
<<winmail.dat>>
