Elysion wrote: > On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:03:20 -0800 > Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> root wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I intend, with 2 support, to make Proposals 5956 and 5962 democratic. >>> I support. With 2 support, I make Proposals 5956 and 5962 democratic, >>> if possible. >> I issue a claim of error against the-AFO-via-comex's purported >> resolution of 5962, as it misreported my vote. (comex, you typoed >> and bought my vote on 5952 instead of 5962.) >> >> I didn't spot any similar errors with 5956 (i.e. the only point of >> contention is how many of ehird's votes were valid), but others are >> invited to double-check and make sure. >> > > Rule 2034/4 (Vote Protection and Cutoff for Challenges) > > [snip] > > Once an Agoran decision has been resolved, votes on it CANNOT be > validly submitted or retracted, and its outcome CANNOT be > changed in any way, rules to the contrary notwithstanding. This > does not prevent correcting errors in reporting its resolution. > > The only argument I can see around that is to argue that a substantially and > deliberately incorrect attempted resolution fails to satisfy 208(c), and thus > the Agoran decisions on proposals 5956 and 5962 have not been resolved.
If the results were incorrect (even accidentally), then it falls afoul of 208(c) and thus isn't a resolution. The point of self-ratification is to legitimize purported resolutions with errors minor enough that they go undetected.
