On 19 Nov 2008, at 17:47, Ed Murphy wrote:

I really don't see someone with a long history of attempting scams being
voted into the office that decides who gets first shot at adjudicating
the success or failure of scams.  Of course, this may change as the
player population does.

FYI, I would use a random number generator. Also: If I assign a scamster
judge to a scam case, it will obviously be appealed no matter what, so I
wouldn't.

Reply via email to